Lets look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and builtin webhard

Let's consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.



Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.



Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.

It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.



It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. 웹하드 순위 Construction.



Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files online at a set monthly cost. Therefore the utilization of web hard has become common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.



In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.



Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.